Medical malpractice cases are hard. They are medically complex, emotionally charged, expensive to litigate, and often take years to reach a jury. For many injured patients and families, mediation offers a practical, controlled way to resolve a case without enduring the risks and delays of trial.
Mediation is not a shortcut and it is not a giveaway. When used correctly, it is one of the most effective tools available to resolve medical malpractice claims fairly.
Mediation is a structured settlement process where both sides meet with a neutral third party, called a mediator, to explore whether the case can be resolved voluntarily.
The mediator is often a retired judge or an experienced trial attorney with deep knowledge of medical malpractice law. The mediator does not decide the case, does not force a result, and does not replace a judge or jury. Instead, the mediator facilitates candid discussions, evaluates risk, and helps both sides realistically assess their positions.
Mediation can occur before a lawsuit is filed, during litigation, or even on the eve of trial.
Medical malpractice cases present unique challenges that make mediation particularly valuable.
First, these cases are expensive and time-consuming for everyone involved. Expert witnesses, depositions, and medical record review drive costs quickly. Mediation can resolve a case before those expenses spiral.
Second, malpractice trials are unpredictable. Even strong cases carry risk. Jurors may struggle with complex medicine or conflicting expert testimony. Mediation allows both sides to control the outcome rather than placing everything in a jury’s hands.
Third, mediation creates space for honest risk assessment. Hospitals, insurers, and physicians are often more candid in mediation than they will ever be in open court.
Finally, mediation can provide closure. For injured patients and families, resolution through mediation can avoid years of uncertainty and emotional strain.
While every mediation is different, most follow a similar structure.
Before mediation, both sides exchange information. This may include a settlement demand, medical summaries, expert opinions, and damages documentation. The goal is to ensure the defense understands the full scope of the injury and the legal claims.
On the day of mediation, each side typically starts in separate rooms. The mediator meets privately with each party, carries offers and counteroffers, and provides feedback on strengths, weaknesses, and risk.
Most of the real work happens in these private sessions. Good mediators challenge assumptions, test defenses, and help both sides move toward a resolution that reflects the realities of the case.
Mediation can last a few hours or an entire day. Some cases resolve quickly. Others take patience.
Many clients worry that agreeing to mediation signals weakness. It does not. Strong cases often settle at mediation precisely because the evidence is compelling.
Another misconception is that mediation guarantees settlement. It does not. Mediation is an opportunity, not an obligation. If the defense refuses to offer a fair resolution, the case continues.
Finally, mediation is not about compromise for its own sake. The goal is not to “split the difference,” but to reach a result that accounts for liability, damages, and trial risk.
While the attorney handles most of the legal strategy, clients play an important role. A few practical tips help maximize the chances of success:
Be prepared emotionally. Mediation can be stressful. Hearing defenses and low initial offers can be frustrating. This is normal and often part of the process.
Trust the preparation. Effective mediation depends on thorough case development beforehand. Strong records, credible experts, and clear damages matter.
Stay patient. Many mediations resolve late in the day, after several rounds of negotiation.
Remain flexible but informed. Understanding your goals, risks, and bottom line is critical, but so is listening to informed advice based on experience.
Not always. Some cases require a jury to hold healthcare providers accountable. Others involve defenses or factual disputes that cannot be resolved without trial.
However, in many medical malpractice cases, mediation offers the best chance to resolve the case efficiently, privately, and on terms that reflect the true value of the harm suffered.
Mediation is not about avoiding accountability. It is about confronting reality, weighing risk, and making informed decisions.
When handled correctly, mediation can spare injured patients and families years of litigation while still achieving meaningful justice. For that reason, it remains one of the most important tools in medical malpractice litigation.
© 2026 Todd N. Hendrickson P.C.|Legal Disclaimer|Privacy Policy